Mock Data: This report could not be found in the database and is showing mock data. Please complete a new survey to see your actual results.

Your Burnout Assessment Results

Generated on 5/5/2026

At a Glance

31
Personal Burnout
(0-100 scale)
1.9
Exhaustion
(1-4 scale)
2.8
Continuance Commitment
(1-7 scale)

Your Burnout Scores

These scores show where you fall compared to established research norms. The colored zones represent typical severity ranges.

Personal Burnout (CBI)

31.3/ 100Low

Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: Personal burnout

LowModerateHighSevere

Work-Related Burnout (CBI)

31.3/ 100Low

Burnout specifically related to your work environment and demands

LowModerateHighSevere

Exhaustion (OLBI)

1.9/ 4Low

Physical and emotional depletion from work demands

LowModerateHighSevere

Disengagement (OLBI)

1.9/ 4Low

Withdrawal from work tasks and loss of interest

LowModerateHighSevere

Reading your scores: These aren't diagnostic tools or prescriptions for action. They're data points to help you see patterns in how you're experiencing work. Consider them alongside your own judgment about what's sustainable for you.

Why You're Staying

Understanding the difference between wanting to stay (affective) vs. feeling you have to stay (continuance).

Affective Commitment

Emotional attachment • wanting to stay

2.8
out of 7
1Norm: 3.67 • Lower than average7

Continuance Commitment

Perceived cost of leaving • having to stay

2.8
out of 7
1Norm: 3.51 • Lower than average7

What this means:

  • •Low affective: You have limited emotional attachment to your work or organization
  • •Low continuance: You perceive few barriers to leaving your current position
  • •The gap between these two scores often reveals whether you're staying because you want to or because you feel you have to

What This Pattern Suggests

Healthy Range

Your scores fall within healthy ranges on both burnout and commitment dimensions. This does not mean everything is perfect, but it does suggest you are not showing the patterns associated with clinical burnout or feeling psychologically trapped.

One Question to Consider:

"What are you doing that works, and how can you protect it?"

Important notes:

  • This is a research tool, not a clinical diagnosis
  • Results are based on validated instruments but should not replace professional consultation
  • Your scores reflect patterns at a single point in time
  • If you're experiencing distress, consider speaking with a mental health professional

Your Follow-up Token

Save this token if you'd like to take a follow-up survey in 6-12 months. It allows us to track changes over time while keeping your responses anonymous.

e1dd3a6f-5600-4abc-87b2-59bf98068c86

•Store this somewhere safe (password manager, note app, etc.)

•You can also bookmark this page - your report will always be available at this URL

•This token contains no personal information and can't be traced back to you

•Return in 6-12 months to retake the survey and compare results

About This Study

Methodology

This survey uses three validated research instruments to measure workplace burnout and organizational commitment:

  • Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) - Measures general burnout across work and personal life domains (Kristensen et al., 2005)
  • Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) - Assesses exhaustion and disengagement as two core dimensions of burnout (Demerouti et al., 2003)
  • Organizational Commitment Scale - Evaluates affective commitment (emotional attachment) and continuance commitment (perceived cost of leaving) (Allen & Meyer, 1990)

Profile Classification

Your profile is determined by the pattern across all measures, not any single score. The five profiles emerged from research on workplace burnout patterns and have been adapted specifically for the FIRE community context.

Data Use & Privacy

Your responses are collected anonymously for research purposes:

  • No personal identifying information is collected or stored
  • Your follow-up token is a random UUID that can't be traced to you
  • Aggregate data may be published in research papers or shared with the FIRE community
  • Individual responses will never be published or shared
  • You can request deletion of your data at any time using your token

References

Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192-207.

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12-23.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

Disclaimer: This tool is for research and educational purposes only. It is not a medical diagnostic instrument and should not be used as a substitute for professional mental health care. If you're experiencing severe burnout or distress, please consult with a qualified healthcare provider.

What's Next?

  • •Save your follow-up token to retake this assessment in 6 months
  • •Consider discussing these results with a trusted colleague or mentor
  • •If you're experiencing distress, consider consulting a mental health professional
  • •Remember: This is a research tool, not a clinical diagnosis
Start New Survey